<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 487 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793106</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing on sales to a USA LLC treated as a pass-through was considered unsustainable where the entity&#039;s income had already been included in the assessee&#039;s Indian taxable income; the related receivables adjustment also fell because it was merely ancillary to the deleted sales adjustment. For specified domestic transactions, the note states that shifting from the assessee&#039;s method to TNMM, with altered comparables and filters, was unjustified where the disclosed margin remained consistent with the accepted range, so the corresponding section 80-IC reduction was not sustainable. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was treated as premature at the initiation stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 487 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793106</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing on sales to a USA LLC treated as a pass-through was considered unsustainable where the entity&#039;s income had already been included in the assessee&#039;s Indian taxable income; the related receivables adjustment also fell because it was merely ancillary to the deleted sales adjustment. For specified domestic transactions, the note states that shifting from the assessee&#039;s method to TNMM, with altered comparables and filters, was unjustified where the disclosed margin remained consistent with the accepted range, so the corresponding section 80-IC reduction was not sustainable. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was treated as premature at the initiation stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>