<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 513 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793132</link>
    <description>A refund deficiency memo in Form GST RFD-03 must state concrete and intelligible defects in the supporting documents. Where the only objection is that documents are incomplete, but the memo records the deficiency in vague terms, it cannot validly defeat the refund claim or substitute for a speaking order. The Delhi HC therefore found the memo unsustainable for vagueness, directed the authority to communicate the precise deficiencies, allow rectification, and then decide the refund application afresh by a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 513 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793132</link>
      <description>A refund deficiency memo in Form GST RFD-03 must state concrete and intelligible defects in the supporting documents. Where the only objection is that documents are incomplete, but the memo records the deficiency in vague terms, it cannot validly defeat the refund claim or substitute for a speaking order. The Delhi HC therefore found the memo unsustainable for vagueness, directed the authority to communicate the precise deficiencies, allow rectification, and then decide the refund application afresh by a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>