<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Burden of proof in penalty cases defeats cash-loan penalties based only on third-party seized papers</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100612</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings under ss. 271D and 271E were held unsustainable where the Revenue relied only on entries in seized papers belonging to third parties, without proving that the assessee actually accepted or repaid cash loans. The Tribunal held that such proceedings are penal in nature and independent of assessment proceedings, so the initial burden remained on the Revenue. That burden was not discharged because the documents were not shown to be the assessee&#039;s own records, no evidence proved utilisation or repayment, and the assessee&#039;s request for copies and cross-examination was denied. The penalties were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Burden of proof in penalty cases defeats cash-loan penalties based only on third-party seized papers</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100612</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings under ss. 271D and 271E were held unsustainable where the Revenue relied only on entries in seized papers belonging to third parties, without proving that the assessee actually accepted or repaid cash loans. The Tribunal held that such proceedings are penal in nature and independent of assessment proceedings, so the initial burden remained on the Revenue. That burden was not discharged because the documents were not shown to be the assessee&#039;s own records, no evidence proved utilisation or repayment, and the assessee&#039;s request for copies and cross-examination was denied. The penalties were deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>