https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469183 The application sought criminal proceedings on the allegation that a common reply and supporting affidavit were filed through an unauthorised representative and that false statements or documents were used despite earlier orders on the director's appointment and record updation. The Tribunal noted prior NCLT orders recognising the appointment process and directing updation of records, and treated the later activation of the DIN as procedural. It also referred to the broad scope of company-law jurisdiction under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 in accepting the appointment-related acts relied on by the respondent. On that basis, it found no reason to initiate criminal proceedings and dismissed the application. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2026 19:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469183 The application sought criminal proceedings on the allegation that a common reply and supporting affidavit were filed through an unauthorised representative and that false statements or documents were used despite earlier orders on the director's appointment and record updation. The Tribunal noted prior NCLT orders recognising the appointment process and directing updation of records, and treated the later activation of the DIN as procedural. It also referred to the broad scope of company-law jurisdiction under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 in accepting the appointment-related acts relied on by the respondent. On that basis, it found no reason to initiate criminal proceedings and dismissed the application. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469183