https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52120 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant successfully challenged the duty liability on bought out parts directly supplied to customers, despite not challenging the previous order remanding the matter for quantification of duty liability. The Tribunal held that the appellant had the jurisdiction to contest the duty liability based on previous tribunal decisions and Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing that findings in a remand order are not binding when a matter is before a higher authority. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:25:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52120 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant successfully challenged the duty liability on bought out parts directly supplied to customers, despite not challenging the previous order remanding the matter for quantification of duty liability. The Tribunal held that the appellant had the jurisdiction to contest the duty liability based on previous tribunal decisions and Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing that findings in a remand order are not binding when a matter is before a higher authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52120