<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793012</link>
    <description>Bail in a conspiracy-linked homicidal assault was assessed on the cumulative balance between liberty and the seriousness of the accusation, with focus on prima facie material, gravity of the offence, nature of evidence, antecedents, age, health, and the risk of witness interference or trial prejudice. On that basis, bail was granted to two accused because of advanced age, medical condition and some evidentiary inconsistencies, while bail was refused to four others because the material still disclosed a sufficient homicidal link, common intention and prima facie case at that stage. The appeals were thus disposed of by selective enlargement on bail and continued custody for the remaining accused, with liberty to renew bail later.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793012</link>
      <description>Bail in a conspiracy-linked homicidal assault was assessed on the cumulative balance between liberty and the seriousness of the accusation, with focus on prima facie material, gravity of the offence, nature of evidence, antecedents, age, health, and the risk of witness interference or trial prejudice. On that basis, bail was granted to two accused because of advanced age, medical condition and some evidentiary inconsistencies, while bail was refused to four others because the material still disclosed a sufficient homicidal link, common intention and prima facie case at that stage. The appeals were thus disposed of by selective enlargement on bail and continued custody for the remaining accused, with liberty to renew bail later.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>