<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 414 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793033</link>
    <description>A notional value in an unimplemented redevelopment agreement does not constitute taxable income for a cooperative housing society where no consideration was received and no enforceable benefit accrued. The agreement was never acted upon: possession was not handed over, the building was not demolished, and no new construction or alternative development materialised. The amount mentioned in the agreement served only as a stamp duty and registration valuation, not as realised income. On these facts, the Tribunal held that the society could not be taxed merely because a redevelopment arrangement existed on paper, and the addition based on the agreement value was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 414 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793033</link>
      <description>A notional value in an unimplemented redevelopment agreement does not constitute taxable income for a cooperative housing society where no consideration was received and no enforceable benefit accrued. The agreement was never acted upon: possession was not handed over, the building was not demolished, and no new construction or alternative development materialised. The amount mentioned in the agreement served only as a stamp duty and registration valuation, not as realised income. On these facts, the Tribunal held that the society could not be taxed merely because a redevelopment arrangement existed on paper, and the addition based on the agreement value was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>