<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 416 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793035</link>
    <description>An appeal rejected in limine for delay without examining the merits was held to require fresh consideration under the statutory appellate scheme and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that where the explanation for delay has not been properly considered, the appellant may be given another opportunity to seek condonation. The dismissal order was set aside and the matter remanded to the first appellate authority to decide condonation of delay afresh and, if delay is condoned, to adjudicate the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 416 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793035</link>
      <description>An appeal rejected in limine for delay without examining the merits was held to require fresh consideration under the statutory appellate scheme and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that where the explanation for delay has not been properly considered, the appellant may be given another opportunity to seek condonation. The dismissal order was set aside and the matter remanded to the first appellate authority to decide condonation of delay afresh and, if delay is condoned, to adjudicate the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>