<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 432 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793051</link>
    <description>An ex parte assessment under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act was set aside because the assessee had not effectively participated despite prior opportunities, but offered an explanation and sought a chance to place the matter on merits. The Court held that a further opportunity was appropriate and allowed the assessee to file a reply and supporting records. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 432 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793051</link>
      <description>An ex parte assessment under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act was set aside because the assessee had not effectively participated despite prior opportunities, but offered an explanation and sought a chance to place the matter on merits. The Court held that a further opportunity was appropriate and allowed the assessee to file a reply and supporting records. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>