<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 438 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793057</link>
    <description>Maintainability of writ petitions was tested against the availability of an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, with the text indicating that writ entertainment was barred where the statutory appellate remedy was available. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition and extended by two weeks the time granted by the High Court to file the Section 107 appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 438 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793057</link>
      <description>Maintainability of writ petitions was tested against the availability of an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, with the text indicating that writ entertainment was barred where the statutory appellate remedy was available. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition and extended by two weeks the time granted by the High Court to file the Section 107 appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>