<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bona fide purchaser&#039;s input tax credit survives supplier tax default, with action reserved against the supplier.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100587</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer who transacted with a registered supplier and complied with statutory requirements merely because the supplier failed to deposit the tax collected from the purchaser. The proper remedy is to proceed against the defaulting supplier, not to shift the burden onto the purchaser by way of vicarious liability. The demand and appellate orders were set aside because the controversy was covered by binding precedent, but the Department retained liberty to act in accordance with law if material shows the transactions were collusive or not bona fide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bona fide purchaser&#039;s input tax credit survives supplier tax default, with action reserved against the supplier.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100587</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer who transacted with a registered supplier and complied with statutory requirements merely because the supplier failed to deposit the tax collected from the purchaser. The proper remedy is to proceed against the defaulting supplier, not to shift the burden onto the purchaser by way of vicarious liability. The demand and appellate orders were set aside because the controversy was covered by binding precedent, but the Department retained liberty to act in accordance with law if material shows the transactions were collusive or not bona fide.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>