<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52109</link>
    <description>The Judge dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow deemed credit to the respondents under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. The Judge ruled that the Tribunal&#039;s previous judgment applied to the case, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that a reference application was pending. Emphasizing that the notification was not an exemption notification, the Judge stated that the strict interpretation principle did not apply. The decision affirmed that the Commissioner (Appeals) correctly followed the Tribunal&#039;s judgment, leading to the validation of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 111 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52109</link>
      <description>The Judge dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow deemed credit to the respondents under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. The Judge ruled that the Tribunal&#039;s previous judgment applied to the case, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that a reference application was pending. Emphasizing that the notification was not an exemption notification, the Judge stated that the strict interpretation principle did not apply. The decision affirmed that the Commissioner (Appeals) correctly followed the Tribunal&#039;s judgment, leading to the validation of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>