<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 358 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792977</link>
    <description>Payments for head-office personnel involved in project identification, bidding, supervision, coordination and monitoring may fall within head office expenditure under section 44C, but the factual character of each item must be verified and any deduction recomputed within the statutory ceiling if section 44C applies. Reimbursements labelled as such do not escape withholding consequences where the underlying services are technical, consultancy, supervisory or managerial and the record does not show that no taxable income arose in India; disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was therefore sustained in the note. The challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was treated as premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 358 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792977</link>
      <description>Payments for head-office personnel involved in project identification, bidding, supervision, coordination and monitoring may fall within head office expenditure under section 44C, but the factual character of each item must be verified and any deduction recomputed within the statutory ceiling if section 44C applies. Reimbursements labelled as such do not escape withholding consequences where the underlying services are technical, consultancy, supervisory or managerial and the record does not show that no taxable income arose in India; disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was therefore sustained in the note. The challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was treated as premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>