<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 182 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52100</link>
    <description>Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 permits deduction of actual freight from assessable value, but not deduction of equalized freight. Where an assessee charged equalized freight, the authority accepted that deduction could still be allowed to the extent of freight actually paid, provided invoices and payment records were examined. The matter was therefore remitted to the original authority to verify the actual freight component and confirm whether duty had been discharged after excluding that amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 182 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52100</link>
      <description>Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 permits deduction of actual freight from assessable value, but not deduction of equalized freight. Where an assessee charged equalized freight, the authority accepted that deduction could still be allowed to the extent of freight actually paid, provided invoices and payment records were examined. The matter was therefore remitted to the original authority to verify the actual freight component and confirm whether duty had been discharged after excluding that amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>