https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792991 A writ petition was not entertained at the threshold where a non-party intervenor's application had been rejected by the Tribunal. The Court held that the proper course was to approach the appellate forum, as a forum of higher strength, and seek leave to file an appeal rather than invoke Article 226 first. The writ remedy was left open only after the appellate court decided the leave application. The petitioner was therefore directed to file an appeal with leave and was given liberty to seek writ relief later if leave was refused. en-us Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792991 A writ petition was not entertained at the threshold where a non-party intervenor's application had been rejected by the Tribunal. The Court held that the proper course was to approach the appellate forum, as a forum of higher strength, and seek leave to file an appeal rather than invoke Article 226 first. The writ remedy was left open only after the appellate court decided the leave application. The petitioner was therefore directed to file an appeal with leave and was given liberty to seek writ relief later if leave was refused. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792991