https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792999 GST assessment orders under Section 74 were interfered with only to the extent of a conditional remand: the taxability dispute, including reverse charge treatment of seigniorage fees, was not decided on merits. The petitioners were required to make a partial cash pre-deposit, file replies to the show cause notices, and produce supporting documents for fresh adjudication. On compliance, the bank attachment was directed to be vacated. The matters were therefore sent back for reconsideration subject to procedural compliance and deposit conditions, with interim relief tied to fulfilment of those directions. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792999 GST assessment orders under Section 74 were interfered with only to the extent of a conditional remand: the taxability dispute, including reverse charge treatment of seigniorage fees, was not decided on merits. The petitioners were required to make a partial cash pre-deposit, file replies to the show cause notices, and produce supporting documents for fresh adjudication. On compliance, the bank attachment was directed to be vacated. The matters were therefore sent back for reconsideration subject to procedural compliance and deposit conditions, with interim relief tied to fulfilment of those directions. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792999