<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 382 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793001</link>
    <description>Unlawful clubbing of GST undervaluation with clandestine removal invalidated the arrest and remand. Undervaluation linked to liability determination was not shown to be legally interchangeable with the offence of clandestine removal, and the remand order failed to address defence objections. Mandatory arrest safeguards were also breached: grounds of arrest were not supplied in the prescribed manner, relative or friend intimation was deficient, the arrest memo omitted the place of arrest, and DIN-related instructions were not followed. The High Court quashed the remand order and consequential proceedings, while permitting fresh action in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 382 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793001</link>
      <description>Unlawful clubbing of GST undervaluation with clandestine removal invalidated the arrest and remand. Undervaluation linked to liability determination was not shown to be legally interchangeable with the offence of clandestine removal, and the remand order failed to address defence objections. Mandatory arrest safeguards were also breached: grounds of arrest were not supplied in the prescribed manner, relative or friend intimation was deficient, the arrest memo omitted the place of arrest, and DIN-related instructions were not followed. The High Court quashed the remand order and consequential proceedings, while permitting fresh action in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>