<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 388 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793007</link>
    <description>A typographical error in an earlier order was corrected so the operative relief matched the intended challenge: only the appellate order was quashed, and the delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The amendment substituted the relevant paragraph to remove reference to any additional order, thereby aligning the final directions with the relief actually sought and preserving the condonation already recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 388 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793007</link>
      <description>A typographical error in an earlier order was corrected so the operative relief matched the intended challenge: only the appellate order was quashed, and the delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The amendment substituted the relevant paragraph to remove reference to any additional order, thereby aligning the final directions with the relief actually sought and preserving the condonation already recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>