<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment and successor liability upheld, but additions on investment sale proceeds deleted for lack of corroboration and denied cross-examination.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100526</link>
    <description>Under the post-1.4.2021 reassessment scheme, notice under section 148 can be issued where the Assessing Officer has material indicating escapement of income, and the sufficiency of incriminating material is tested in reassessment, not at the notice stage; the reopening was therefore upheld. The Tribunal also held that section 170 governs successor liability on amalgamation and that absence of pending proceedings on the amalgamation date did not invalidate action against the successor. On merits, additions treating sale proceeds of earlier-year investments as unexplained cash credit, and related commission for alleged accommodation entries, were deleted because the transactions were supported by banking records, the investments had earlier been accepted, and reliance on third-party statements without cross-examination violated natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment and successor liability upheld, but additions on investment sale proceeds deleted for lack of corroboration and denied cross-examination.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100526</link>
      <description>Under the post-1.4.2021 reassessment scheme, notice under section 148 can be issued where the Assessing Officer has material indicating escapement of income, and the sufficiency of incriminating material is tested in reassessment, not at the notice stage; the reopening was therefore upheld. The Tribunal also held that section 170 governs successor liability on amalgamation and that absence of pending proceedings on the amalgamation date did not invalidate action against the successor. On merits, additions treating sale proceeds of earlier-year investments as unexplained cash credit, and related commission for alleged accommodation entries, were deleted because the transactions were supported by banking records, the investments had earlier been accepted, and reliance on third-party statements without cross-examination violated natural justice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>