<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unsigned penalty notice invalid where statutory signature requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional defect cannot be cured.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100519</link>
    <description>An unsigned notice initiating penalty proceedings under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was held invalid because section 282A requires statutory notices to be signed. Printing the authority&#039;s name, office, or a DIN did not satisfy that mandatory requirement, and the defect was treated as jurisdictional rather than technical. The assessee&#039;s participation and section 292B could not cure the absence of signature, and a later signed reminder notice did not validate the original initiation. As the Assessing Officer never acquired valid jurisdiction to proceed, the consequential reminder notice and penalty order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unsigned penalty notice invalid where statutory signature requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional defect cannot be cured.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100519</link>
      <description>An unsigned notice initiating penalty proceedings under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was held invalid because section 282A requires statutory notices to be signed. Printing the authority&#039;s name, office, or a DIN did not satisfy that mandatory requirement, and the defect was treated as jurisdictional rather than technical. The assessee&#039;s participation and section 292B could not cure the absence of signature, and a later signed reminder notice did not validate the original initiation. As the Assessing Officer never acquired valid jurisdiction to proceed, the consequential reminder notice and penalty order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>