<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 175 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52093</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the dealer&#039;s invoices showed an incorrect despatch source when the inputs were received in the factory, their duty-paid character was not disputed, and their use in manufacture was established. The invoice defect was attributable to the dealer, not the assessee, and by itself did not justify disallowance of credit. On the same reasoning, the connected penalty and interest were also unsustainable. The impugned order was therefore set aside for all three appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 175 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52093</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the dealer&#039;s invoices showed an incorrect despatch source when the inputs were received in the factory, their duty-paid character was not disputed, and their use in manufacture was established. The invoice defect was attributable to the dealer, not the assessee, and by itself did not justify disallowance of credit. On the same reasoning, the connected penalty and interest were also unsustainable. The impugned order was therefore set aside for all three appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>