<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2010 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469167</link>
    <description>Ad hoc disallowance of audited expenditure cannot stand without specific defects in the books, and an estimated 10% addition was deleted where no particular bogus or unverifiable item was identified. Warranty provision allowability depends on verification of historical reversals, accounting consistency, and whether the provision was reversed in the next year, so the matter required de novo examination. Delayed deposit of employees&#039; PF contribution remained disallowable under the distinct treatment of section 36(1)(va), despite return-filing timelines. Composite CENVAT duty and penalty payments must be bifurcated, with only the penal component hit by disallowance, so the major deletion was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 11:04:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2010 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469167</link>
      <description>Ad hoc disallowance of audited expenditure cannot stand without specific defects in the books, and an estimated 10% addition was deleted where no particular bogus or unverifiable item was identified. Warranty provision allowability depends on verification of historical reversals, accounting consistency, and whether the provision was reversed in the next year, so the matter required de novo examination. Delayed deposit of employees&#039; PF contribution remained disallowable under the distinct treatment of section 36(1)(va), despite return-filing timelines. Composite CENVAT duty and penalty payments must be bifurcated, with only the penal component hit by disallowance, so the major deletion was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>