<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1752 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469159</link>
    <description>An intervention application filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was directed to be placed before the concerned Bench for consideration. The HC required the Tribunal to deal with the application in accordance with law and after giving the parties an opportunity of hearing. The relief granted was procedural in nature, ensuring that the application was formally received, placed before the proper Bench, and decided on merits by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 13:16:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1752 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469159</link>
      <description>An intervention application filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was directed to be placed before the concerned Bench for consideration. The HC required the Tribunal to deal with the application in accordance with law and after giving the parties an opportunity of hearing. The relief granted was procedural in nature, ensuring that the application was formally received, placed before the proper Bench, and decided on merits by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>