<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 296 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792915</link>
    <description>Actual utilisation of capital gains for construction of a new residential house before filing a valid return under section 139(4) satisfies section 54, and the exemption cannot be denied merely because the amount was not deposited in the capital gains account by the due date under section 139(1). The disallowance was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of section 54.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 296 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792915</link>
      <description>Actual utilisation of capital gains for construction of a new residential house before filing a valid return under section 139(4) satisfies section 54, and the exemption cannot be denied merely because the amount was not deposited in the capital gains account by the due date under section 139(1). The disallowance was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of section 54.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>