<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 300 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792919</link>
    <description>A fixed place permanent establishment under the India-Canada DTAA requires a place of business at the enterprise&#039;s disposal, permanence, and business carried on through that place; mere access to customer premises for project-specific work was insufficient, so no fixed place permanent establishment existed in India. An installation or supervisory permanent establishment also was not constituted because the relevant activities did not exceed the treaty&#039;s 120-day threshold in the 12-month period; accordingly, no income could be attributed on that basis. The additions based on the alleged permanent establishment were therefore unsustainable and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 300 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792919</link>
      <description>A fixed place permanent establishment under the India-Canada DTAA requires a place of business at the enterprise&#039;s disposal, permanence, and business carried on through that place; mere access to customer premises for project-specific work was insufficient, so no fixed place permanent establishment existed in India. An installation or supervisory permanent establishment also was not constituted because the relevant activities did not exceed the treaty&#039;s 120-day threshold in the 12-month period; accordingly, no income could be attributed on that basis. The additions based on the alleged permanent establishment were therefore unsustainable and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>