<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 306 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792925</link>
    <description>The petitions were disposed of because an alternative statutory appeal remedy was available under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court left the petitioners at liberty to pursue the appeals before the Appellate Authority, indicating that the writ route was not treated as the appropriate forum where the statutory remedy remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 306 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792925</link>
      <description>The petitions were disposed of because an alternative statutory appeal remedy was available under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court left the petitioners at liberty to pursue the appeals before the Appellate Authority, indicating that the writ route was not treated as the appropriate forum where the statutory remedy remained open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>