https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792927 A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was not examined on merits because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court sustained the preliminary objection, held that the petitioner could raise the same grounds before the appellate authority, and noted that the period for filing the appeal had not expired. The writ petition was disposed of without any expression on the merits, all issues were left open for appeal, and the petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy within the time granted by the Court. en-us Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:07:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792927 A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was not examined on merits because an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The Court sustained the preliminary objection, held that the petitioner could raise the same grounds before the appellate authority, and noted that the period for filing the appeal had not expired. The writ petition was disposed of without any expression on the merits, all issues were left open for appeal, and the petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy within the time granted by the Court. Case-Laws GST Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792927