https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792930 The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition because an effective statutory appellate remedy before the CGST Appellate Tribunal was available and had already commenced functioning. Since the impugned order-in-appeal fell within the notified extension, appeals against orders communicated before 01.04.2026 could be filed up to 30.06.2026. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the Tribunal, with liberty to raise the same grounds in appeal and to file within the extended period. en-us Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:26:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792930 The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition because an effective statutory appellate remedy before the CGST Appellate Tribunal was available and had already commenced functioning. Since the impugned order-in-appeal fell within the notified extension, appeals against orders communicated before 01.04.2026 could be filed up to 30.06.2026. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the Tribunal, with liberty to raise the same grounds in appeal and to file within the extended period. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792930