<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1608 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469142</link>
    <description>Section 108 of the Customs Act authorises a customs officer to summon any person whose evidence or documents are needed for an enquiry, and that power is not limited to proceedings against the summoned person. A challenge based on the underlying enquiry involving non-physical imports was held irrelevant to the validity of the summons. The summons were treated as sufficiently specific, repeated requests for documents already supplied were found not to cause prejudice, and GST summons guidelines were held inapplicable and non-binding in customs proceedings. In the absence of prejudice, writ interference was declined and the summons were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:23:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1608 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469142</link>
      <description>Section 108 of the Customs Act authorises a customs officer to summon any person whose evidence or documents are needed for an enquiry, and that power is not limited to proceedings against the summoned person. A challenge based on the underlying enquiry involving non-physical imports was held irrelevant to the validity of the summons. The summons were treated as sufficiently specific, repeated requests for documents already supplied were found not to cause prejudice, and GST summons guidelines were held inapplicable and non-binding in customs proceedings. In the absence of prejudice, writ interference was declined and the summons were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>