https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792801 The retention of seized cash and connected articles was sustained because the appellant was found to have received the relied upon documents, namely the punchnamas, and no further document relied on by the respondents was shown to have been withheld. A complaint of breach of natural justice therefore failed. On the merits, the appellant did not satisfactorily explain the source of the cash at the time of search or through later material, and the prosecution complaint already sought confiscation of the seized amount. On that basis, continued retention of the cash, documents and digital devices was held justified and the retention order was affirmed. en-us Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792801 The retention of seized cash and connected articles was sustained because the appellant was found to have received the relied upon documents, namely the punchnamas, and no further document relied on by the respondents was shown to have been withheld. A complaint of breach of natural justice therefore failed. On the merits, the appellant did not satisfactorily explain the source of the cash at the time of search or through later material, and the prosecution complaint already sought confiscation of the seized amount. On that basis, continued retention of the cash, documents and digital devices was held justified and the retention order was affirmed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792801