<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 206 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792825</link>
    <description>The first appellate authority could set aside an ex parte assessment for denovo adjudication where additional documents such as ledgers, invoices, gate passes, weighment slips and bank records required fresh verification; the remand was treated as a proper exercise of co-terminus appellate powers, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. A reassessment was also held unsustainable because no notice under section 143(2) had been issued; that notice is mandatory for validity, and section 292BB cures only defects in service, not complete non-issuance. The reassessment was invalid and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 206 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792825</link>
      <description>The first appellate authority could set aside an ex parte assessment for denovo adjudication where additional documents such as ledgers, invoices, gate passes, weighment slips and bank records required fresh verification; the remand was treated as a proper exercise of co-terminus appellate powers, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. A reassessment was also held unsustainable because no notice under section 143(2) had been issued; that notice is mandatory for validity, and section 292BB cures only defects in service, not complete non-issuance. The reassessment was invalid and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>