<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 232 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792851</link>
    <description>Cash deposits were treated as explained where the assessee supported them with bank statements, withdrawal details, affidavits, sworn statements, agricultural evidence, and material showing family partition and past savings; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance of insurance-business expenses was also held unsustainable because the assessee, an LIC agent, showed a business nexus and reasonable expenditure pattern, and the Revenue did not rebut the claim merely for want of vouchers; the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 232 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792851</link>
      <description>Cash deposits were treated as explained where the assessee supported them with bank statements, withdrawal details, affidavits, sworn statements, agricultural evidence, and material showing family partition and past savings; the addition was deleted. Ad hoc disallowance of insurance-business expenses was also held unsustainable because the assessee, an LIC agent, showed a business nexus and reasonable expenditure pattern, and the Revenue did not rebut the claim merely for want of vouchers; the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>