<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 241 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792860</link>
    <description>Cooperative societies seeking deduction under Section 80P faced delay in filing returns because statutory audits, COVID-19 disruption and administrative difficulties prevented timely compliance under Section 139(1) read with Section 80AC. The CBDT circulars issued under Section 119(2)(b) were described as a hardship-relief mechanism, and a rigid insistence on day-to-day explanation was treated as hyper-technical where the delay arose from circumstances beyond the assessees&#039; control. The decision emphasises that a purposive and liberal construction is required where the scheme is intended to mitigate genuine hardship, and that substantive entitlement should not be defeated by an unduly restrictive approach to condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 241 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792860</link>
      <description>Cooperative societies seeking deduction under Section 80P faced delay in filing returns because statutory audits, COVID-19 disruption and administrative difficulties prevented timely compliance under Section 139(1) read with Section 80AC. The CBDT circulars issued under Section 119(2)(b) were described as a hardship-relief mechanism, and a rigid insistence on day-to-day explanation was treated as hyper-technical where the delay arose from circumstances beyond the assessees&#039; control. The decision emphasises that a purposive and liberal construction is required where the scheme is intended to mitigate genuine hardship, and that substantive entitlement should not be defeated by an unduly restrictive approach to condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>