<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 242 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792861</link>
    <description>A builder&#039;s supply of MHADA-reserved flats to identified allottees after the occupancy certificate remained a taxable works-contract supply under GST because the construction and transfer obligation arose at the plan-sanction and commencement-certificate stage, and additional FSI formed non-monetary consideration. The transaction was not outside GST as a sale of immovable property, as the completion-based exclusion did not apply where consideration was not received only after completion. For valuation, section 15(1) did not apply because price was not the sole consideration; the supply had to be valued under Rule 27 on open market value, using comparable flats in the same project, and not at the MHADA-prescribed regulated price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 242 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792861</link>
      <description>A builder&#039;s supply of MHADA-reserved flats to identified allottees after the occupancy certificate remained a taxable works-contract supply under GST because the construction and transfer obligation arose at the plan-sanction and commencement-certificate stage, and additional FSI formed non-monetary consideration. The transaction was not outside GST as a sale of immovable property, as the completion-based exclusion did not apply where consideration was not received only after completion. For valuation, section 15(1) did not apply because price was not the sole consideration; the supply had to be valued under Rule 27 on open market value, using comparable flats in the same project, and not at the MHADA-prescribed regulated price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>