<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Condonation of delay requires consideration of pleaded explanations; rejection as time-barred set aside for non-speaking order.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100457</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the appellate order rejecting the appeal as time-barred because the authority failed to consider the petitioner&#039;s pleaded grounds for condonation of delay, including the assertion that filing was delayed due to counsel&#039;s mistake after documents had been handed over. Rejection of limitation without dealing with these material explanations amounted to non-consideration of relevant contentions and a non-reasoned decision. The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law after notice to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Condonation of delay requires consideration of pleaded explanations; rejection as time-barred set aside for non-speaking order.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100457</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the appellate order rejecting the appeal as time-barred because the authority failed to consider the petitioner&#039;s pleaded grounds for condonation of delay, including the assertion that filing was delayed due to counsel&#039;s mistake after documents had been handed over. Rejection of limitation without dealing with these material explanations amounted to non-consideration of relevant contentions and a non-reasoned decision. The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law after notice to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:37:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>