https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469127 A registered sale deed carries a presumption of due execution, so the burden rested on the plaintiff to prove impersonation or forgery with reliable evidence. The courts below found, on appraisal of the oral and documentary material, that the deed was executed for consideration and that the plaintiff failed to discharge that burden; the plaintiff also did not enter the witness box, and the expert evidence was inconclusive. Those findings were based on substantive evidence and disclosed no legal infirmity, so no substantial question of law arose in second appeal. en-us Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2026 11:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469127 A registered sale deed carries a presumption of due execution, so the burden rested on the plaintiff to prove impersonation or forgery with reliable evidence. The courts below found, on appraisal of the oral and documentary material, that the deed was executed for consideration and that the plaintiff failed to discharge that burden; the plaintiff also did not enter the witness box, and the expert evidence was inconclusive. Those findings were based on substantive evidence and disclosed no legal infirmity, so no substantial question of law arose in second appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469127