<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 107 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792726</link>
    <description>For post-agreement transactions, the nature of movement of goods must be determined from the governing agreement and contemporaneous evidence for the relevant period; pre-period material cannot by itself convert a consignment arrangement into an inter-State sale. Applying Section 3(a) and Section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, the agreement showed that the goods were consigned to agents, remained the principal&#039;s property until sale, and were to be treated as consignment transactions, so the turnover was not inter-State sales. Once that characterisation failed, the higher penalty resting on it also fell, while the reduced penalty sustained by the first appellate authority remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 107 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792726</link>
      <description>For post-agreement transactions, the nature of movement of goods must be determined from the governing agreement and contemporaneous evidence for the relevant period; pre-period material cannot by itself convert a consignment arrangement into an inter-State sale. Applying Section 3(a) and Section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, the agreement showed that the goods were consigned to agents, remained the principal&#039;s property until sale, and were to be treated as consignment transactions, so the turnover was not inter-State sales. Once that characterisation failed, the higher penalty resting on it also fell, while the reduced penalty sustained by the first appellate authority remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>