<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 143 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792762</link>
    <description>Reassessment sanction under section 151 was held invalid where the approval proforma wrongly referred to section 147(b), a provision no longer in force, and the sanctioning authority recorded only perfunctory, mechanical satisfaction on a standard format. The absence of meaningful application of mind rendered the approval ritualistic and vitiated the assumption of jurisdiction for reassessment. The jurisdictional objection was therefore accepted, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 143 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792762</link>
      <description>Reassessment sanction under section 151 was held invalid where the approval proforma wrongly referred to section 147(b), a provision no longer in force, and the sanctioning authority recorded only perfunctory, mechanical satisfaction on a standard format. The absence of meaningful application of mind rendered the approval ritualistic and vitiated the assumption of jurisdiction for reassessment. The jurisdictional objection was therefore accepted, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>