<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 159 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792778</link>
    <description>Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act extended the time limit for specified financial years and permitted input tax credit to be availed in returns filed up to 30.11.2021, notwithstanding the limitation under Section 16(4). On that basis, reversal of credit solely as time-barred under Section 16(4) could not be sustained. The Madras High Court therefore quashed the impugned order to the extent it denied input tax credit on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 159 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792778</link>
      <description>Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act extended the time limit for specified financial years and permitted input tax credit to be availed in returns filed up to 30.11.2021, notwithstanding the limitation under Section 16(4). On that basis, reversal of credit solely as time-barred under Section 16(4) could not be sustained. The Madras High Court therefore quashed the impugned order to the extent it denied input tax credit on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>