<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 162 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792781</link>
    <description>In GST penalty matters, the High Court held that a writ petition should ordinarily not be entertained where an effective statutory appeal is available under the CGST Act. Service of notice by registered post was recognised as a valid mode under the Act, and the petitioner&#039;s dispute about receipt of the show cause notice did not justify bypassing the appellate remedy. The Court held that all objections, including alleged denial of hearing, could be raised before the appellate authority. Applying the rule that tax disputes should generally be pursued through the remedy provided by statute, the writ petition was dismissed and the petitioner was left to pursue appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 162 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792781</link>
      <description>In GST penalty matters, the High Court held that a writ petition should ordinarily not be entertained where an effective statutory appeal is available under the CGST Act. Service of notice by registered post was recognised as a valid mode under the Act, and the petitioner&#039;s dispute about receipt of the show cause notice did not justify bypassing the appellate remedy. The Court held that all objections, including alleged denial of hearing, could be raised before the appellate authority. Applying the rule that tax disputes should generally be pursued through the remedy provided by statute, the writ petition was dismissed and the petitioner was left to pursue appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>