<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 171 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792790</link>
    <description>Arrest and detention were treated as illegal because the arrest memo did not disclose the place of arrest, the grounds of arrest were not shown to have been furnished, and the arrest documents did not bear CBIC-DIN as required by the departmental circular. The court treated these defects as violations of the mandatory arrest procedure and, on that basis, directed the petitioner&#039;s immediate release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 171 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792790</link>
      <description>Arrest and detention were treated as illegal because the arrest memo did not disclose the place of arrest, the grounds of arrest were not shown to have been furnished, and the arrest documents did not bear CBIC-DIN as required by the departmental circular. The court treated these defects as violations of the mandatory arrest procedure and, on that basis, directed the petitioner&#039;s immediate release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>