https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792791 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment, while leaving the petitioner free to pursue available remedies. It permitted the appeal to be filed on making the necessary pre-deposits within eight weeks. The challenge to the validity of Section 16(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was left open for consideration before the appropriate forum, and no final ruling on that issue was recorded in this note. en-us Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:50:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792791 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment, while leaving the petitioner free to pursue available remedies. It permitted the appeal to be filed on making the necessary pre-deposits within eight weeks. The challenge to the validity of Section 16(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was left open for consideration before the appropriate forum, and no final ruling on that issue was recorded in this note. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792791