<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 119 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the enhanced value of imported machinery for customs duty assessment. The appellants were granted a cash refund of the excess customs duty paid, as the unjust enrichment principle was found inapplicable due to them being the ultimate consumers of the goods and not passing on the duty burden. The Tribunal interpreted relevant sections of the Customs Act to support the decision, directing the refund to the appellants within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 119 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the enhanced value of imported machinery for customs duty assessment. The appellants were granted a cash refund of the excess customs duty paid, as the unjust enrichment principle was found inapplicable due to them being the ultimate consumers of the goods and not passing on the duty burden. The Tribunal interpreted relevant sections of the Customs Act to support the decision, directing the refund to the appellants within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>