<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52033</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to value aerated water for central excise duty based on ex-factory prices, in accordance with Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found no error in accepting the factory gate prices as the assessable value, dismissing the appellant&#039;s arguments of inadequacy in the Commissioner&#039;s analysis. The appeal was deemed lacking in merit and appeared to be a routine challenge without substantial grounds, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the affirmation of the original valuation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52033</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to value aerated water for central excise duty based on ex-factory prices, in accordance with Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found no error in accepting the factory gate prices as the assessable value, dismissing the appellant&#039;s arguments of inadequacy in the Commissioner&#039;s analysis. The appeal was deemed lacking in merit and appeared to be a routine challenge without substantial grounds, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the affirmation of the original valuation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>