https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469103 Review jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to discovery of new matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or a comparable sufficient reason, and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. An order that reappreciates rival contentions, reassesses the merits, and remits the matter for fresh consideration travels beyond the permissible scope of review. The Supreme Court noted that the impugned review order did not identify an apparent error but instead reopened the controversy on merits, thereby exceeding review powers. The review order was therefore liable to be set aside and the earlier order restored. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 21:23:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469103 Review jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to discovery of new matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or a comparable sufficient reason, and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. An order that reappreciates rival contentions, reassesses the merits, and remits the matter for fresh consideration travels beyond the permissible scope of review. The Supreme Court noted that the impugned review order did not identify an apparent error but instead reopened the controversy on merits, thereby exceeding review powers. The review order was therefore liable to be set aside and the earlier order restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469103