https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469122 Reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act were not finally adjudicated in writ jurisdiction; instead, the challenge to the notices under section 148, the order under section 148A(d), and the consequential notice was left for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer. The Court did not rule on the merits of the impugned reassessment actions and, in light of the Revenue's request for remand, directed the petitioner to file the chart before the Assessing Officer, who was to grant a hearing and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. en-us Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:53:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469122 Reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act were not finally adjudicated in writ jurisdiction; instead, the challenge to the notices under section 148, the order under section 148A(d), and the consequential notice was left for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer. The Court did not rule on the merits of the impugned reassessment actions and, in light of the Revenue's request for remand, directed the petitioner to file the chart before the Assessing Officer, who was to grant a hearing and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469122