https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469098 Stenographers in subordinate offices were held not entitled to automatic parity with Stenographers Grade C in the Central Secretariat under the principle of equal pay for equal work, because parity depends on a real comparison of duties, responsibilities, confidentiality, skill, reliability and recruitment conditions, and the available material showed functional and hierarchical differences. The Tribunal's review order was also held unsustainable because review has a narrow scope and cannot be used to rehear the matter on merits or act as an appellate forum over a final order. The impugned review judgment was therefore set aside. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 15:52:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469098 Stenographers in subordinate offices were held not entitled to automatic parity with Stenographers Grade C in the Central Secretariat under the principle of equal pay for equal work, because parity depends on a real comparison of duties, responsibilities, confidentiality, skill, reliability and recruitment conditions, and the available material showed functional and hierarchical differences. The Tribunal's review order was also held unsustainable because review has a narrow scope and cannot be used to rehear the matter on merits or act as an appellate forum over a final order. The impugned review judgment was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469098