<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1805 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469094</link>
    <description>A challenge to notice under section 153C was not entertained where earlier section 148 proceedings had been quashed with liberty to proceed in accordance with law. The Court held that, in that background, the assessee could not object to the subsequent section 153C proceedings on limitation grounds, and the rejection of objections was ; no interference with the notice was warranted. The assessee was left free to raise all available defences before the authorities, who were directed to pass a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1805 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469094</link>
      <description>A challenge to notice under section 153C was not entertained where earlier section 148 proceedings had been quashed with liberty to proceed in accordance with law. The Court held that, in that background, the assessee could not object to the subsequent section 153C proceedings on limitation grounds, and the rejection of objections was ; no interference with the notice was warranted. The assessee was left free to raise all available defences before the authorities, who were directed to pass a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>