<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 87 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52024</link>
    <description>A limited company was treated as a separate legal entity for excise exemption purposes, so its production could not be clubbed with the production of other units merely because of common inter-relationship. Applying the relevant departmental circulars and the 1956 clarification, the Tribunal held that each public or private limited company manufacturing goods was entitled to a separate exemption limit. The earlier finding of inter-relationship between the units was left undisturbed, but the remand was confined to the effect of the circular on the limited company unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:32:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 87 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52024</link>
      <description>A limited company was treated as a separate legal entity for excise exemption purposes, so its production could not be clubbed with the production of other units merely because of common inter-relationship. Applying the relevant departmental circulars and the 1956 clarification, the Tribunal held that each public or private limited company manufacturing goods was entitled to a separate exemption limit. The earlier finding of inter-relationship between the units was left undisturbed, but the remand was confined to the effect of the circular on the limited company unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>