https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52022 Duty deposited during the pendency of an appeal is treated as payment under protest, so the assessee is not required to separately comply with the protest procedure under Rule 233B to claim consequential refund after success in appeal. On that basis, rejection of refund was held unsustainable and consequential relief followed. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:28:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52022 Duty deposited during the pendency of an appeal is treated as payment under protest, so the assessee is not required to separately comply with the protest procedure under Rule 233B to claim consequential refund after success in appeal. On that basis, rejection of refund was held unsustainable and consequential relief followed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52022