<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 123 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52022</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, considering the payment made by the appellants during the pending appeal as under protest. The refund claim, initially rejected, was later granted in favor of the appellants following the precedent set in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. UOI.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 123 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52022</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, considering the payment made by the appellants during the pending appeal as under protest. The refund claim, initially rejected, was later granted in favor of the appellants following the precedent set in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. UOI.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>